|
Recent reports suggest that local authorities are gearing up to snoop into our homes in order to re-evaluate them for Council Tax.
Documents from the Valuation Office Agency released under parliamentary questions show good views, nearby shops and ‘peace and quiet’ have all been used to calculate how much council tax homes should be liable for, Tories have complained.
The information appertained to Wales but Conservative spokeswoman Caroline Spelman warned they could be applied to houses elsewhere in the UK, creating a "punishing and cynical tax on people's quality of life".
Although local government minister Phil Woolas has accused the Tories of scaremongering, County Homesearch assesses the price of a room with a view.
Employing a system called ‘intelligent proximity analysis’, valuation officers will be able to assess a home on a range of criteria including whether it’s in a good area or even if has a spectacular view - the new system will compute if a house is worth more because it overlooks a golf course, a historic city or is within an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
All these things, according to a survey by County Homesearch, can add many thousands of pounds to a property and that is something the Valuation Office Agency intends to find out in its survey of the country’s housing stock.
Jonathan Haward, managing director of the County Homesearch company, said: “Many things impact on the price of a property. Even a particularly pretty house with the same accommodation as its more ordinary looking counterpart can fetch a premium of up to 25%, depending on its aspect.”
“Certainly a house with a river frontage or a sea view can fetch 50% more than for a house of similar accommodation that does not enjoy such sought after location. No doubt that is something the valuation officers will be taking account of when they attempt to re-evaluate our homes.”
Last year County Homesearch bought in excess of £100 million worth of property on behalf of their clients and they have been assessing the premium buyers have to pay for the privilege of overlooking a village green, having a sea view or a meandering river in front of their front door.
The firm’s 24 branches were asked to assess the respective costs of a property with or without a particular view. Here are the results of their findings:
|
Central London: House overlooking park v House with no view of park or square |
£4.5m
£4.2m |
Premium for park view: 7% |
|
Wales: Three bedroom detached house with estuary views with 1/4 acre garden running down to the estuary in St Dogmaels, Pembrokeshire v Three bedroom detached house with 3/4 acre garden in St Dogmaels, Pembrokeshire |
£350,000
£225,000 |
Premium for a estuary views: 56% |
|
Cornwall: A second home in St Ives with direct views of the sea v St Ives town house without sea view |
£400,000
£320,000 |
Premium for a sea view: 25% |
|
Scotland: St Andrews, terraced property overlooking the 18th Green of St Andrews Old Course (the one the Open is played on!) v Similar property with no view of the golf course |
£2.4m
£400,000 |
Premium for view of golf course: 600% |
|
Cotswolds: Four bedroom period village house in the Cotswolds, facing the village green V Similar, four bedroom period village house without a view |
£785, 000
£630,000 |
Premium for view of village green: 25% |
|
Devon: Large detached property in the rural outskirts of Torquay with 180 degree views of Lyme Bay v Similar detached property further inland, without a view |
£1m
£700,000 |
Premium for waterside view: 43% |
|
Brighton: Three bed Regency apartment, with sea view in Brighton v Three bed apartment in same block but without view |
£940, 000
£790, 000 |
Premium for sea view: 16% |
|
Kent: Six bedroom 1930’s house with 2 acres and a fantastic view of the Weald towards Penshurst v Other, very similar property but with no view (and some road noise!) |
£1.65m
£1.4m |
Premium for view: 15% |
|
East Sussex: Bewl Water, – five bedroom chalet type house, set in an acre, right on the headland of the reservoir with outstanding views v A better looking five bed Victorian house with 4 acres about ¼ mile inland (no view of water) |
£1.25m
£910,000 |
Premium for view of water: 27% |
|
Scotland: In the picturesque fishing village of Cellardyke in Fife, a four bedroom semi-detached house, with uninterrupted sea view V A similar 5 bedroom property, with no sea view |
£400,000
£195,000 |
Premium for sea view: 105% |
|
Birmingham: City centre apartment on 16th floor with views of the city v Apartment in the same block on the 1st floor without a view |
£265,500
£172,500 |
Premium for city view: 49% |
|
Wiltshire: House in Fisherton de la Mer, with far reaching views and a garden that runs down to the river v A similar sized house in the same small village without views of the river |
£700,000
£640,000 |
Premium for view of river: 9% |
Jonathan Haward said: “The survey shows that houses with ‘something extra’ such as being adjacent to a common or park, overlooking a river or perched above a city can add a great deal of money to the price of a property.”
“The government is aware of this and by employing state-of-the-art computer models could soon be snooping into our homes to raise more revenue.”
“Homeowners who currently have the added luxury of a ‘room with a view’ should beware, government is watching and if their computing models work - which check on 287 ‘lifestyle variables’ – they may, according to Conservative Party estimates, have to pay a sizeable hike in their next year’s council tax bill.”
|